Italy: Duca D'Aosta.- I heard from the horse mouth, that it struggles a lot on Tier 8 Battles. Should it have Preferential Matchmaking: Yes (up to tier 8 battles) United Kingdom: Nelson.- Ah, good ol' Nelson, not much to say about it, except that it is the favorite fodder for big bad boys from tier 9. Preferential Matchmaking: Maybe (up to tier 8 battles) Preferential Matchmaking: Maybe (up to tier 7 battles) Graf Spee: Not sure, some times struggles, some times goes fine. Should it have Preferential Matchmaking: Maybe (up to tier 9 battles) On the other hand, as a new comer, perhaps it is still too early for a preferential M.M. From my point of view, Odin struggles nn Tier 10 battles, Not only on HP, but with main guns range (I' ll take Tirptiz for Tier 10 battles instead of a Odin). Germany: Odin.- On initial Tests, it was at first quite OP, but then it suffered a massive nerf on Health Points. U.S.S.R.: Stalinium Rounds and Armor Comrade. Should they have Preferential Matchmaking: Yes (up to tier 8 battles) USA: Atlanta and Flint.- At first, they were quite a pair of pain buggers on tier 9 battles, (There were less tech tree ships/nations), but now, with the current skill tree and meta, and the nerf on Flint's firing distance, both cruiser are frequently outgunned on tier 9 battles (And yes,I know, this is not Wolrd of Tanks, But even there you wont, see a IS-6 or a Jagdtiger 8.8 facing tier 10 battles). Look like the time has almos tcome to goive to certai ships, some Preferential Match Making to certain premium ships, In the Beginning they were well suited for their task but no with all the New Nations and tech trees, such ships are often outclassed when they are 2 levels away from their base tier.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |